Children and adults are differentially affected by presentation modality in the DRM paradigm

8Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Using the Deese - Roediger - McDermott (DRM) method for free recall, we examined mode of list presentation and association type in 8-9 year old children and adults. Participants verbally recalled lists of associates that were presented orally (Experiment 1) or visually (Experiment 2). Lists consisted of semantic associates (e.g. hound, puppy, etc.), phonological associates (e.g. log, dot, etc.) and both semantic and phonological associates (e.g. hound, dot, etc.) to a nonpresented lure word (e.g. dog). Interestingly, the ratio of false to true recall was higher in children than adults only when lists were presented orally. These results suggest that children rely more on sublexical information or item-specific information than adults when reading lists, and, thus, are less likely to activate the critical lure via lexical associations. Furthermore, these results suggest that information processing differences at encoding between children and adults need to be taken into account when interpreting free recall studies. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khanna, M. M., & Cortese, M. J. (2009). Children and adults are differentially affected by presentation modality in the DRM paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(6), 859–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1519

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free