Institutional Monitoring, Political Connections and Audit Fees: Evidence from Malaysian Firms

72Citations
Citations of this article
179Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study employs data on Malaysian firms from 2003 to 2011 to show that ownership by institutional investors is positively associated with audit fees, and this positive association is stronger for firms that are politically connected to the Malaysian government. The results of this study are aligned with the theories that institutional investors can play an effective monitoring role by demanding higher audit quality, particularly if their investee firms are politically connected. Additional tests reveal that the main results are largely driven by foreign institutional investors, while it is insignificant for local institutional investors. Therefore, our evidence suggests that institutional investors, particularly foreign institutions, demand increased audit effort (proxied by audit fees) as a method to monitor politically connected firms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tee, C. M., Gul, F. A., Foo, Y. B., & Teh, C. G. (2017). Institutional Monitoring, Political Connections and Audit Fees: Evidence from Malaysian Firms. International Journal of Auditing, 21(2), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12086

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free