Ancient Chinese medical ethics and the four principles of biomedical ethics

109Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The four principles approach to biomedical ethics (4PBE) has, since the 1970s, been increasingly developed as a universal bioethics method. Despite its wide acceptance and popularity, the 4PBE has received many challenges to its cross-cultural plausibility. This paper first specifies the principles and characteristics of ancient Chinese medical ethics (ACME), then makes a comparison between ACME and the 4PBE with a view to testing out the 4PBE's cross-cultural plausibility when applied to one particular but very extensive and prominent cultural context. The result shows that the concepts of respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence and justice are clearly identifiable in ACME. Yet, being influenced by certain socio-cultural factors, those applying the 4PBE in Chinese society may tend to adopt a 'beneficence-oriented', rather than an 'autonomy-oriented' approach, which, in general, is dissimilar to the practice of contemporary Western bioethics, where 'autonomy often triumphs'.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsai, D. F. C. (1999). Ancient Chinese medical ethics and the four principles of biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 25(4), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.25.4.315

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free