Evaluation of four disease management programs: evidence from blue cross blue shield of Louisiana

Abstract

Aims: Chronic diseases impose a substantial healthcare burden. This study sought to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of new disease management (DM) programs, targeting four major chronic disease groups: diabetes, coronary heart disease (CHD)/hypertension (HTN), asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and congestive heart failure (CHF)/chronic kidney disease (CKD). Materials and methods: Between March 1, 2015, and February 28, 2018, members with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana insurance were contacted and enrolled in a DM program if they were aged 18 years through 64 years, eligible for a DM program, and had not been previously enrolled in a DM program. Active enrollees of a DM program (“IN” group) were compared to members who were not yet enrolled (“OUT” group). Average per member per month (PMPM) costs were aggregated annually to document any descriptive trends. Multivariable model estimates were used to compare PMPM costs for all IN subjects and all OUT subjects. Total medical savings were evaluated for the following time intervals: 1–12 months, 13–24 months, and 25–36 months. Results: For all four DM programs, average costs PMPM trended upward over time for the OUT cohort, while they remained relatively stable for the IN cohort. Some evidence also showed that DM programs improved clinical outcomes, such as hemoglobin A1c values. A difference in difference analysis showed PMPM savings for all four programs combined of $31.61, $50.45, and $53.72 after 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Multivariable modeling results showed total savings after 3 years of $14,460,174 for all DM programs combined. Limitations: Although multivariable models adjusted for several clinical, demographic, and economic characteristics; it is possible that some important confounders were missing due to lack of data. Conclusions: DM programs implemented to control diabetes, CHD/HTN, CHF/CKD, and asthma/COPD are cost-effective and show some evidence of improved clinical outcomes.