Evaluation of the efficacy and safety is most important for introducing the vaccine. But when introducing widely using public resources such as routine vaccination, it is also necessary to consider cost-effectiveness. In this paper, we first introduce the situation of ACIP in the United States and JCVI in the UK as examples of using cost-effectiveness analysis for vaccine policy in other countries. Next, I will outline the situation of efforts at the immunization inoculation group of the Infectious Disease Subcommittee of the Welfare Science Council of Japan and the vaccination/vaccine section of the Health Science Council. Next, we describe the necessity of standardization of research methods and outline the research guidelines on the evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of immunization prepared by the authors so far. With reference to the analysis guidelines for cost-effectiveness evaluation already used in the Chuikyo, this guideline considers vaccinespecific issues such as loss of productivity and Herd effect while trying to unify within a possible range such as discount rate etc. Based on this guideline, the economic evaluation is carried out by a unified method. It will be possible to do scientific discussions on the appropriateness of introducing routine vaccination of each vaccine, the priority order, the subjects of inoculation, the method of inoculation, etc. based on the financial influence and the value from a social point of view.
CITATION STYLE
IKEDA, S. (2018). 2.Policy Application of Health Technology Assessment : Economic Evaluation of Vaccination. Japanese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology/Yakuzai Ekigaku, 23(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.3820/jjpe.23.11
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.