Office reconditioning of stainless steel orthodontic attachments

28Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

An investigation was conducted to determine a simple, effective method for reconditioning stainless steel orthodontic attachments in the orthodontic office. In total, 100 new brackets were bonded to premolar teeth, then debonded and the bond strength recorded as a control for the reconditioning process. The debonded brackets were divided into six groups and each group reconditioned using different techniques as follows: attachments in four groups were flamed and then either (1) sandblasted, (2) ultrasonically cleaned, (3) ultrasonically cleaned followed by silane treatment, (4) rebonded without further treatment. Of the two remaining groups, one was sandblasted, while the brackets in the other were roughened with a greenstone. The brackets were rebonded to the premolar teeth after the enamel surfaces had been re-prepared, and their bond strengths measured. The results indicated that sandblasting was the most effective in removing composite without a significant change in bond strength compared with new attachments. Silane application did not improve the bond strength values of flamed and ultrasonically cleaned brackets. Attachments that had only been flamed had the lowest bond strength, followed by those that had been roughened with a greenstone. © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontics Society. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Quick, A. N., Harris, A. M. P., & Joseph, V. P. (2005). Office reconditioning of stainless steel orthodontic attachments. European Journal of Orthodontics, 27(3), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjh100

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free