Infrastructural critique. The upside down of the bottom-up: A case study of the IBA Berlin 84/87

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Participation in planning is a logical consequence of the democratisation of society due to the social and cultural changes related to modernism. Anarchistic participation, as in Autogestion, within a development process, is a critical utopian alternative draft to existing power structures. The participatory turn represented by the International Building Exhibition Berlin 1987 (IBA) meant the institutionalisation of these utopian ideas, resulting in a heterotopian notion of participation instrumentalised by governing and economic forces. The most important aspect to our argument is that participation is a matter of critique - with critique as the very core of the modern understanding of progress - and thus enabling forms of improvement in planning, regulating and governing with architectural and urbanistic means. Those means simply embody a specific form of resisting critique and certain shifts in the structures of governing revealing an infrastructural critique which both re-forms the elements and the relations of what is to be resisted.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hierzer, E. M., & Schörkhuber, P. M. (2013). Infrastructural critique. The upside down of the bottom-up: A case study of the IBA Berlin 84/87. Footprint, (13), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.59490/footprint.7.2.773

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free