Spatial coexistence of American beech and sugar maple regeneration in post-harvest northern hardwood forests

13Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Context: Fine scale regeneration patterns of coexistent species are influenced by regeneration mechanisms and microsite requirements. Spatial patterns may be either disjunct or overlapping, which will determine competitive effects and microsite dominance, and future forest composition. Aims: Using American beech (Fagus grandifolia Ehrh.) and sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marshall) as an example, three hypotheses were tested: (1) random beech spatial patterns, (2) clumped spatial patterns of small sugar maple seedlings, and (3) disjunct beech and sugar maple patterns. Methods: Individual stems were sampled in a contiguous grid of 1-m2 quadrats across a 576-m2 area at three sites. Densities were separated into three height classes (≤30 cm, 30–90 cm, and > 90 cm, ≤4 cm diameter at breast height). Spatial statistics and regression were used to analyze spatial patterns and correlations. Results: Beech and seedling sugar maple patterns were patchy, rejecting the first and not rejecting the second hypotheses. Hypothesis three was rejected because patches of the two species overlapped with advance regeneration beech overtopping sugar maple. Conclusion: Patchy patterns of advance regeneration beech and post-harvest sugar maple establishment suggest spatiotemporal niche partitioning. Beech had a competitive height advantage following harvest, but sugar maple still occurred in beech-free patches and beneath overtopping beech at a fine scale. Self-replacing beech patterns will ensure the species will continue dominance unless a selective chemical or manual treatment is applied that removes beech and releases sugar maple.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nelson, A. S., & Wagner, R. G. (2014). Spatial coexistence of American beech and sugar maple regeneration in post-harvest northern hardwood forests. Annals of Forest Science, 71(7), 781–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-014-0376-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free