Evaluation of the effects of forest on slope stability and its implications for forest management: A case study of Bailong River Basin, China

15Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the mechanical effects of vegetation roots on slope stability can be classified as additional cohesion effects and anchorage effects. The present study investigated the combined mechanical effects (additional cohesion effects and anchorage effects) of vegetation on a slope with coarse-grained soil in the mountainous region (significantly prone to slope failure) of Gansu Province, China. A detailed survey of tree density, root system morphology and slope profiles was conducted, and we also assessed the soil cohesion provided by the root systems of monospecific stands of Robinia pseudoacacia growing in different locations on the slope. The measured data were incorporated into a numerical slope model to calculate the stability of the slope under the influence of trees. The results indicated that it was necessary to consider the anchoring effect of coarse roots when estimating the mechanical effects of trees on slope stability. In particular, the FoS (factor of safety) of the slope was increased by the presence of trees. The results also demonstrated that vegetation increased slope stability. The reinforcing effects were most significant when the trees were planted along the entire slope. Although the reinforcing effects contributed by trees were limited (only 4-11%), they were essential for making optimal use of vegetation for enhancing slope stability. Overall, vegetation development can make a major contribution to ecosystem restoration in the study region.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, S., Zhao, M., Meng, X., Chen, G., Zeng, R., Yang, Q., … Wang, B. (2020). Evaluation of the effects of forest on slope stability and its implications for forest management: A case study of Bailong River Basin, China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166655

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free