Evidence of asymmetric information in the automobile insurance market: Dichotomous versus multinomial measurement of insurance coverage

27Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the empirical analysis of information asymmetry in automobile insurance markets, prior research used a dichotomous measurement approach that induces excessive bundling in coverage measurements and sample selection biases. To improve on the conditional correlation method for testing information asymmetry, we propose a multinomial measurement approach that constructs coverage categories at ordered multinomial levels. With this approach, we find robust evidence of information asymmetry in both coverage area and coverage amount choices, which we could not find with the dichotomous measurement approach. It thus demonstrates the sensitivity of the empirical findings to the method used to measure insurance coverage. © 2009 The Journal of Risk and Insurance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, H., Kim, D., Im, S., & Hardin, J. W. (2009). Evidence of asymmetric information in the automobile insurance market: Dichotomous versus multinomial measurement of insurance coverage. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 76(2), 343–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2009.01302.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free