Abstract
The NINDS trial demonstrated for the first time the effectiveness of intravenous thrombolysis in improving outcome after acute ischemic stroke. The absolute benefit of this intervention was 11-13% greater chance of being normal or near normal (MRS ≤ 1) at 3 months. However, if patients with severe stroke were considered (NIHSS ≥ 20), the absolute benefit dropped to 5-6%, indicating that IV thrombolysis may not be as effective for large vessel occlusion. This observation was further supported by TCD studies that clearly demonstrated that large artery occlusions had a recanalization rate of 13-18% with IV rt-PA. Intra-arterial thrombolysis achieves recanalization rates of 60-70%. Since tissue viability is clearly important, it is time to stop defining rigid time windows and if there is a large penumbra (20-50%) and the occlusion is in a large artery, there exists a logic and a growing evidence to consider either bridge therapy or direct intra-arterial therapy. Copyright © 2010 Termedia & Banach.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Padma, S., & Majaz, M. (2010, June). Intra-arterial versus intra-venous thrombolysis within and after the first 3 hours of stroke onset. Archives of Medical Science. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2010.14248
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.