A practical discussion to avoid common pitfalls when constructing multiple choice questions items

14Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to produce a guide for improving the quality of Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) used in undergraduate and postgraduate assessment. Multiple Choice Questions type is the most frequently used type of assessment worldwide. Well constructed, context rich MCQs have a high reliability per hour of testing. Avoidance of technical items flaws is essential to improve the validity evidence of MCQs. Technical item flaws are essentially of two types (i) related to testwiseness, (ii) related to irrelevant difficulty. A list of such flaws is presented together with discussion of each flaw and examples to facilitate learning of this paper and to make it learner friendly. This paper was designed to be interactive with self-assessment exercises followed by the key answer with explanations.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-Faris, E. A., Alorainy, I. A., Abdel-Hameed, A. A., & Al-Rukban, M. O. (2010). A practical discussion to avoid common pitfalls when constructing multiple choice questions items. Journal of Family and Community Medicine, 17(2), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-1683.71992

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free