Abstract
The growth models approach (GMA) has become increasingly prominent in Comparative Political Economy over the last years. While it has originally been developed for advanced economies, there is a growing number of applications for developing countries. This raises the question of how readily transferable the GMA concepts are to the peripheral capitalist experience. This paper explores the analytical building blocks for an extension of the GMA to developing economies from post-Keynesian-structuralist perspective. It argues that in a developing country context supply-side considerations will be more important and build on structuralist theory to understand the ‘real’ constraints in the developing countries' growth process. It uses Minskyan theory to understand how currency hierarchy creates financial causes for international economic stratification. As a consequence, the role of the state is more crucial than in advanced economies, but at the same time states are more vulnerable. This paper concludes by reflecting on the key concepts of GMA, finance-led, export-led and state-led growth in the light of developing economies and identifying neoliberal as well developmentalist versions of these.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Stockhammer, E. (2023). Macroeconomic ingredients for a growth model analysis for peripheral economies: a post-Keynesian-structuralist approach. New Political Economy, 28(4), 628–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2022.2149723
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.