The Crossroads: Interdisciplinary Teams and Alternative Treatments

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Behavior analysts collaborating within interdisciplinary teams are likely to find themselves at difficult crossroads. Some of these crossroads include implementing alternative treatments, defining and determining risk and harm, and evaluating research and interventions. The purpose of this paper is to highlight some of these crossroads and provide guidelines on successfully navigating them. We contend that it is possible to navigate these crossroads while minimizing harm or risk for the client, adhering to the principles of science and behavior analysis, and remaining respectful of all members of the interdisciplinary team. That is, we can maintain the scientific tenets of philosophic doubt, empiricism, and experimentation, while remaining humble, and ensuring our clients access the most effective interventions available.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leaf, J. B., Cihon, J. H., Ferguson, J. L., Milne, C., & Oppenheim-Leaf, M. L. (2023). The Crossroads: Interdisciplinary Teams and Alternative Treatments. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 15(3), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2023.291

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free