MicroRNA nomenclature and the need for a revised naming prescription

73Citations
Citations of this article
173Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A central environment and interface for microRNA (miRNA) registry and repository and a general standardized framework for their systematic annotation was established over a decade ago. However, the numbers of experimentally and computationally identified miRNAs are swiftly accumulating, and new aspects of miRNA-mediated gene regulation are being revealed. Currently, it is of great significance that the annotation framework should be redefined to include newly discovered miRNA species such as the variants of mature miRNAs (isomiRNAs), and organellar miRNAs: cipomiRNAs and mitomiRNAs. It is also of great importance that key terminology referring to the novelty, evolutionary history or biogenesis of miRNAs, as well as the confidence of their identification are standardized in the literature and disseminated in a central miRNA registry. Here, we review the status of miRNA nomenclature, curation and critical points of need for a revision of miRNA nomenclature and terminology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Budak, H., Bulut, R., Kantar, M., & Alptekin, B. (2016, January 1). MicroRNA nomenclature and the need for a revised naming prescription. Briefings in Functional Genomics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elv026

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free