Cultural Differences in Attitudes Toward Action and Inaction: The Role of Dialecticism

35Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The current research examined whether nations differ in their attitudes toward action and inaction. It was anticipated that members of dialectical East Asian societies would show a positive association in their attitudes toward action/inaction. However, members of non-dialectical European-American societies were expected to show a negative association in their attitudes toward action/inaction. Young adults in 19 nations completed measures of dialectical thinking and attitudes toward action/inaction. Results from multi-level modeling showed, as predicted, that people from high dialecticism nations reported a more positive association in their attitudes toward action and inaction than people from low dialecticism nations. Furthermore, these findings remained after controlling for cultural differences in individualism-collectivism, neuroticism, gross-domestic product, and response style. Discussion highlights the implications of these findings for action/inaction goals, dialecticism, and culture. © The Author(s) 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zell, E., Su, R., Li, H., Ho, M. H. R., Hong, S., Kumkale, T., … Albarracín, D. (2013). Cultural Differences in Attitudes Toward Action and Inaction: The Role of Dialecticism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 521–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612468774

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free