Analisa Perbandingan Pengendali PID pada Motor DC Menggunakan Metode Ziegler-Nichols dan Trial and Error

  • Afrawira R
  • Fajar Gumilang R
  • Amalia S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to design a PID control on a DC motor using 2 tuning methods, namely Trial & Error and Ziegler-Nichols. The results showed that the Pittman DC Motor system response from the Pittman DC motor was very unstable, in which there were still many oscillations and a very high overshoot value. In the Trial & Error method, the system response value was obtained on the P controller, namely, rise time = 0.000551 s, settling time = 0.00468 s, overshoot = 37.1 %, peak time = 0.972 s, and time delay = 0.00134 s. on the PI controller namely, rise time = 0.000396 s, settling time = 0.00534 s, overshoot = 47.7%, peak time = 1.23 s, and time delay = 0.00102 s. on the PID controller namely, rise time = 0.000223 s, settling time = 0.00502 s, overshoot = 64.6%, peak time = 1.54 s, and time delay = 0.000601 s. In the Ziegler-NIchols method, the response value of the system to the P controller is obtained, namely, rise time = 0.00118 s, settling time = 0.00564 s, overshoot = 15.4%, peak time = 0.178 s, and time delay = 0.00262 s. on the PI controller namely, rise time = 0.000275 s, settling time = 0.00531 s, overshoot = 58.3%, peak time = 1.44 s, and time delay = 0.000767 s. on the PID controller, namely, rise time = 0.00133 s, settling time = 0.00446 s, overshoot = 12.6 %, peak time = 0.0237 s, and time delay = 0.00288 s. The simulation results show that the value for the Ziegler-Nichols tuning method is better than the Trial & Error method, perhaps because the input value for the Trial & Error method is larger.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Afrawira, R., Fajar Gumilang, R., Amalia, S., & Bandri, S. (2023). Analisa Perbandingan Pengendali PID pada Motor DC Menggunakan Metode Ziegler-Nichols dan Trial and Error. Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 5(3), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v5i3.758

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free