The reliability and validity of the Hungarian version of the abridged ways of savoring checklist

11Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Our emotions during positive experiences can be processed in different ways. We can make a distinction between reactions that increase and reactions that decrease the intensity of the experience. Aim: The aim of our study was to present the adaptation of the Hungarian version of the Abridged Ways of Savoring Checklist (WOSC). This scale measures the potential cognitive and behavioral responses during positive experiences. Method: Data from our cross-sectional study (N = 596, 296 male, 300 female) are analyzed. To examine the validity of the scale, we used instruments measuring orientation to happiness, satisfaction with life, and vitality. Results: The principal component analysis revealed 2 components: savoring positive experiences versus dampening positive experiences. The reliability of the scale is good, but the goodness of fit of the two-component model was weak. The validity of the scale proved to be adequate: savoring positive experiences goes with higher level of positive mental health indicators, while dampening positive experiences goes with lower level of positive mental health indicators. Conclusions: The Hungarian version of WOSC is a useful measure of the reactions during positive experiences.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Szondy, M., Martos, T., Szabó-Bartha, A., & Pünkösty, M. (2014). The reliability and validity of the Hungarian version of the abridged ways of savoring checklist. Mentalhigiene Es Pszichoszomatika, 15(3), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1556/Mental.15.2014.3.10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free