Participation in real-world laboratories in a new light?! Closing the gap between co-creative and deliberative participation

8Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sustainability-oriented real-world laboratories involve the co-design and co-creation of knowledge, based on a trans-disciplinary cooperation between actors from different social worlds – academia, the administration, business, civil society – each endowed with specific interests, resources and world-views. Sustainability-oriented real-world laboratories claim to be a means of inclusive participation in the co-creative shaping of solutions for socioecological issues and exploring pathways to sustainability. In the literature dealing with sus-tainability-oriented real-world laboratories, participation is thus mainly understood as active involvement by civil society, change agents and citizens in processes of experimentation and the implementation of solutions. We call this co-creative participation. However, participation in talk-based opinion formation and decision-making processes – we call this deliberative participation – is hardly discussed in the respective literature. In this paper, we argue that co-creative and deliberative participation are two forms of participation which can be conceptualized differently but which are both relevant for successful experimentation in sustainability-oriented real-world laboratories and are mainly intertwined in practice. We propose an ideal-typical conceptual framework for participation in sustainability-oriented real-world laboratories that combines co-creative and deliberative participation. The aim is to contribute to a systematization of, and rationale for, different forms of participation in real-world laboratories.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sonnberger, M., & Lindner, D. (2021). Participation in real-world laboratories in a new light?! Closing the gap between co-creative and deliberative participation. Raumforschung Und Raumordnung, 79(4), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.27

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free