The “Third” Eye: Ethics of Video Recording in the Context of Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy

6Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In light of high-profile cases of sexual assault and other unethical conduct by therapists, recent clinical research involving psychedelic drugs has generally mandated the video recording of therapy sessions. In this paper, I address a gap in the literature by investigating ethical issues related to video recording in the unique context of psychedelic therapy sessions. I begin by summarizing the important benefits and risks related to video recording. I then examine ethical concerns about mandatory recording of psychedelic therapy sessions from a patient perspective and argue that these concerns must be taken seriously by clinicians and researchers. I also examine the view that video recording is essential for clinician safety. Given the legitimacy of concerns from both perspectives, I outline some basic informed consent considerations that could generate dialogue around potential patient concerns and defend the option to opt-out for both patients and clinicians. In conclusion, I underscore the importance of further critical bioethical inquiry and qualitative research regarding video recording practices in the context of psychedelic-assisted therapies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rajwani, K. (2023). The “Third” Eye: Ethics of Video Recording in the Context of Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy. Canadian Journal of Bioethics, 6(3–4), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.7202/1108000ar

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free