Analysis of moisture, oil, and fatty acid composition of olives by near-infrared spectroscopy: development and validation calibration models

18Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Olive is a new, expanding crop in Georgia. Its oil content steadily increases with maturity, but eventually plateaus at the maximum when the olives should be promptly harvested, avoiding overripening and quality degradation. This requires frequent testing. However, olive quality analysis by wet chemistry is laborious, slow and costly, whereas near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS), being precise, accurate, rapid and cheap, could be suitable. We developed and validated NIRS calibration models for moisture, fresh-matter-oil (oil-FMO), dry-matter-oil (oil-DMO) and major fatty acid composition analyses. RESULTS: Of the12 models developed, seven constituents – moisture, oil-FMO, oil-DMO, and palmitic, palmitoleic, oleic and linoleic acids (representing 88–97% of the total fatty acids) had low standard errors and high coefficients of determination (R2 = 0.81–0.98; 1 − VR = 0.74–0.86) for both calibration and cross-validation. For these seven constituents, predictions of an independent validation set yielded excellent agreement between the NIRS predicted values and the reference values with low standard error of prediction (SEP), low bias, high coefficient of determination (r2 = 0.80–0.93) and high ratios of performance to deviation (RPD = SD/SEP; 2.21–3.85). CONCLUSION: Precise, accurate and rapid analysis of fresh olives for moisture, oil and major fatty acid composition can be done at a low cost using NIRS, meeting the analytical needs of the industry. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saha, U., & Jackson, D. (2018). Analysis of moisture, oil, and fatty acid composition of olives by near-infrared spectroscopy: development and validation calibration models. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 98(5), 1821–1831. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8658

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free