Subjective Well-Being by Partnership Status and Its Dependence on the Normative Climate

  • Verbakel E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study first examines the relationship between partnership status and subjective well-being in 45 European countries by analyzing the European Values Study 2008. It was expected and empirically confirmed that married individuals have the highest level of well-being, followed by (in order) cohabiting, dating, single, and finally widowed and divorced individuals. In addition, this study examines to what extent the well-being gaps depend on the normative climate in which an individual lives. It is hypothesized that: (a) being in a non-married relationship (especially cohabitation and divorce) lowers well-being compared to being married in societies that reject non-traditional partnership statuses; and (b) not having a partner is especially detrimental for well-being levels in familialistic societies, which emphasize the importance of a strong, close-knit family. The normative climate appears to hardly affect well-being gaps between partnership statuses. Only the gap between divorced and married women is significantly wider in familialistic societies. It is concluded that the weak dependence of well-being on the normative climate may point at high autonomy in private, relationship-related decisions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Verbakel, E. (2012). Subjective Well-Being by Partnership Status and Its Dependence on the Normative Climate. European Journal of Population / Revue Européenne de Démographie, 28(2), 205–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-012-9257-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free