A Survey of MulVAL Extensions and Their Attack Scenarios Coverage

42Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Organizations employ various adversary models to assess the risk and potential impact of attacks on their networks. A popular method of visually representing cyber risks is the attack graph. Attack graphs represent vulnerabilities and actions an attacker can take to identify and compromise an organization's assets. Attack graphs facilitate the visual presentation and algorithmic analysis of attack scenarios in the form of attack paths. MulVAL is a generic open-source framework for constructing logical attack graphs, which has been widely used by researchers and practitioners and extended by them with additional attack scenarios. This paper surveys all of the existing MulVAL extensions and maps all MulVAL interaction rules to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques to estimate their attack scenarios coverage. This survey aligns current MulVAL extensions along unified ontological concepts and highlights the existing gaps. It paves the way for the systematic improvement of MulVAL and the comprehensive modeling of the entire landscape of adversarial behaviors captured in MITRE ATT&CK.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tayouri, D., Baum, N., Shabtai, A., & Puzis, R. (2023). A Survey of MulVAL Extensions and Their Attack Scenarios Coverage. IEEE Access, 11, 27974–27991. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3257721

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free