Contingent self-definition and amorphous regions

  • Dinnie K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article explores the concept of contingent self-definition, whereby place brands employ flexible self-definitional approaches in constructing their place brand architecture. Adopting a view of regions as social constructs, the article builds on and extends previous work on place brand architecture by identifying the underlying factors that drive contingent self-definition decisions. Based on an empirical study of professionals tasked with managing region brands in the Netherlands, 11 factors are identified as drivers of contingent self-definition by place brands. These factors are grouped into four thematic categories: (i) external perceptions, (ii) proximity, (iii) brand relationships, and (iv) politics and power. A dynamic approach to place brand architecture is advocated, foregrounding the amorphous character of regions as social constructs that defy reification solely as fixed territorial-administrative spaces.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dinnie, K. (2018). Contingent self-definition and amorphous regions. Marketing Theory, 18(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593117708467

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free