Abstract
There are errors in the Funding section. The correct funding information is as follows: This research is part of the CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry and the Global Comparative Study on REDD+, with funding support from the USAID (grant number MTO069018, http://www.usaid.gov/), the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) (grant number QZA 12/0882 and QZA-16/0110 No. 1500551, http://www.norad.no/), the International Climate Initiative (IKI) of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) (grant number KI II 7-42206-6/75, https://www.international-climate-initiative.com), and the CGIAR. The above mentioned funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Correction: What is a “community perception” of REDD+? A systematic review of how perceptions of REDD+ have been elicited and reported in the literature (PLoS ONE (2016) 11: 11 (e0155636) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155636). (2017, March 1). PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173547
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.