Correction: What is a "community perception" of REDD+? A systematic review of how perceptions of REDD+ have been elicited and reported in the literature (PLoS ONE (2016) 11: 11 (e0155636) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155636)

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There are errors in the Funding section. The correct funding information is as follows: This research is part of the CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry and the Global Comparative Study on REDD+, with funding support from the USAID (grant number MTO069018, http://www.usaid.gov/), the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) (grant number QZA 12/0882 and QZA-16/0110 No. 1500551, http://www.norad.no/), the International Climate Initiative (IKI) of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) (grant number KI II 7-42206-6/75, https://www.international-climate-initiative.com), and the CGIAR. The above mentioned funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Correction: What is a “community perception” of REDD+? A systematic review of how perceptions of REDD+ have been elicited and reported in the literature (PLoS ONE (2016) 11: 11 (e0155636) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155636). (2017, March 1). PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173547

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free