Comparisons of Talstar Formulations and Dursban Toward Ants on Turf; 1997

  • Swier S
  • Rollins A
  • Lamarche R
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This trial was conducted at Whit Mountain Country Club, Ashland, NH. Four replications of 7 treatments were applied to 2 bluegrass fairways in a RCB design on 23 Jun. Each plot wa 2500 ft2 in area. All liquid formulations were applied using a 2-wheel bicycle-type boom sprayer equipped with 4 spray heads; each head was equippe with an 8005 flat fan-type nozzle and a 50-mesh strainer. The volume of water and insecticide mix per plot was 1 gal/1000 ft2; CO2 was the source of pres sure at 40 psi. Granular formulations were applied with a Lesco broadcast lawn spreader. Weather conditions on the 23rd (10 am) were as follows: air temp, 77°F, sky, scattered clouds; wind, 15 mph. Soil conditions on the 5th fairway were as follows: texture, silt loam; sand, 34%; silt, 50%; clay, 16% soil moisture, 24%; 76%; organic matter, 7.4%; pH, 5.6. Soil conditions on the 13th fairway were as follows: texture, loamy sand; sand, 83%; silt, 10% clay, 7%; moisture, 11%; organic matter, 3.7%; pH, 5.2. Active anthills were counted pretreatment, and 7 and 14 DAT. Treatment in each plot were rate by counting the number of anthills in 28 1-yd2 subplots prior to spraying, and then 7 and 14 DAT.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Swier, S. R., Rollins, A., Lamarche, R., & Hodgson, M. (1998). Comparisons of Talstar Formulations and Dursban Toward Ants on Turf; 1997. Arthropod Management Tests, 23(1), 338–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/amt/23.1.338a

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free