The influence of PKA treatment on the Ca 2+ activation of force generation by trout cardiac muscle

16Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

β-Adrenergic stimulation of the mammalian heart increases heart rate, the strength of contraction as well as the kinetics of force generation and relaxation. These effects are due to the phosphorylation of select membrane and thin filament proteins by cAMPactivated protein kinase (PKA). At the level of the sarcomere, it is typically the phosphorylation of cardiac myosin binding protein C (cMyBP-C) and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) that is responsible for the change in the kinetics of contraction and relaxation. Trout cTnI (ScTnI) lacks two critical PKA targets within the N-terminus of the protein that, when phosphorylated in mammalian cTnI, cause a reduction in myofilament Ca 2+ affinity. To determine what role the contractile element plays in the response of the trout heart to b-adrenergic stimulation, we characterized the influence of PKA treatment on the Ca 2+ activation of skinned preparations dissected from ventricular trabeculae. In these experiments, isometric force generation and the rate of force development were measured over a range of Ca 2+ concentrations. The results demonstrate that PKA treatment does not influence the Ca 2+ sensitivity of force generation but it decreases maximum force generation by 25% and the rate of force re-development at maximal activation by 46%. Analysis of the trabeculae preparations for phosphoproteins revealed that PKA treatment phosphorylated myosin light chain 2 but not cTnI or cMyBP-C. These results indicate that the function of the trout cardiac contractile element is altered by PKA phosphorylation but in a manner different from that in mammalian heart. © 2011. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gillis, T. E., & Klaiman, J. M. (2011). The influence of PKA treatment on the Ca 2+ activation of force generation by trout cardiac muscle. Journal of Experimental Biology, 214(12), 1989–1996. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.052084

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free