Rituximab plus cladribine versus R-CHOP in frontline management of marginal zone lymphoma in China: a propensity-score matched multicenter study

Abstract

Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is an uncommon subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Combination of rituximab and cladribine (R-2CdA) is a potential option for indolent NHL (iNHL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients. The goal of this multicenter retrospective study was to assess the efficacy and safety of R-2CdA in MZL to support consensus-reaching in first-line therapy in advanced-stage patients. We searched electronic medical records databases of eight centers in China. Between November 2014 and December 2019, 183 symptomatic advanced MZL patients (42 treated with R-2CdA and 141 with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisone [R-CHOP]) were identified. After propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) to adjust for clinical characteristics, 39 patients from each treatment arm were selected. The overall response rate (ORR) (84.6% vs. 94.9%, P = 0.263) and complete response rate (59.0% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.487) were comparable between two protocols. Neither progression-free survival (PFS), including the 5-year PFS (67.7% vs. 56.1%, P = 0.352), nor overall survival was improved by R-2CdA versus R-CHOP. However, R-2CdA was more tolerable than R-CHOP in MZL patients regarding grade 3/4 hematological adverse events (odds ratio [OR] 0.565, 95% confidence interval [CI] neutropenic fever (OR 0.795, 95% CI 0.678–0.932), and infections (OR 0.800, 95% CI 0.640–1.000). Overall, our study demonstrated that R-2CdA is potentially as effective as but safer than R-CHOP in advanced MZL.