Plasmodium falciparum infection prevalence among children aged 6–59 months from independent DHS and HIV surveys: Nigeria, 2018

4Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Prevalence estimates are critical for malaria programming efforts but generating these from non-malaria surveys is not standard practice. Malaria prevalence estimates for 6–59-month-old Nigerian children were compared between two national household surveys performed simultaneously in 2018: a Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) and the Nigeria HIV/AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (NAIIS). DHS tested via microscopy (n = 8298) and HRP2-based rapid diagnostic test (RDT, n = 11,351), and NAIIS collected dried blood spots (DBS) which were later tested for histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2) antigen (n = 8029). National Plasmodium falciparum prevalence was 22.6% (95% CI 21.2– 24.1%) via microscopy and 36.2% (34.6– 37.8%) via RDT according to DHS, and HRP2 antigenemia was 38.3% (36.7–39.9%) by NAIIS DBS. Between the two surveys, significant rank-order correlation occurred for state-level malaria prevalence for RDT (Rho = 0.80, p < 0.001) and microscopy (Rho = 0.75, p < 0.001) versus HRP2. RDT versus HRP2 positivity showed 24 states (64.9%) with overlapping 95% confidence intervals from the two independent surveys. P. falciparum prevalence estimates among 6–59-month-olds in Nigeria were highly concordant from two simultaneous, independently conducted household surveys, regardless of malaria test utilized. This provides evidence for the value of post-hoc laboratory HRP2 detection to leverage non-malaria surveys with similar sampling designs to obtain accurate P. falciparum estimates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oviedo, A., Abubakar, A., Uhomoibhi, P., Maire, M., Inyang, U., Audu, B., … Steinhardt, L. C. (2023). Plasmodium falciparum infection prevalence among children aged 6–59 months from independent DHS and HIV surveys: Nigeria, 2018. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28257-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free