Changes in cardiovascular risk factors in a type 1 diabetes population: A 3.5-year study

5Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in a cohort of patients with type 1 diabetes attending a routine diabetic clinic, and to compare the data with those from a previous study (2003-2004). The clinic records of 218 patients with type 1 diabetes from the previous study were examined. The following were recorded: age, sex, duration of diabetes, insulin regimen, weight, body mass index, blood pressure, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), lipid profile, urine albumin-creatinine ratio, and the presence of micro- and macrovascular complications. Data were available from 184 (84.4%) of the original 218 patients - mean age 37.3 years (range 20-76 years), and duration of diabetes 18.4 years (4-42 years). Mean HbA1c, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein improved significantly between the two study periods (respectively: 9.6±1.9% vs 9.1±1.7%, p<0.01; 5.0±1.0mmol/L vs 4.4±1.1mmol/L, p<0.01; 2.8±0.8mmol/L vs 2.3±0.8mmol/L, p<0.01). However, systolic (113±19mmHg vs 122±17mmHg, p<0.01) and diastolic blood pressure (65±10mmHg vs 67±9mmHg, p<0.01) increased despite greater use of antihypertensives. It was concluded that attention to cardiovascular risk factors can result in improvements in HbA1c and lipid profile in a routine clinic. However, blood pressure levels increase and compliance with medication must be emphasised. A large proportion of patients with type 1 diabetes continue to have cardiovascular risk factors above current targets and additional strategies are required. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wallymahmed, M. E., Morgan, C., Gill, G. V., Osman-Hicks, V., Chamberlain, P., & MacFarlane, I. A. (2008). Changes in cardiovascular risk factors in a type 1 diabetes population: A 3.5-year study. Practical Diabetes International, 25(6), 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/pdi.1258

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free