Historicity in metapragmatics – A study on ‘discernment’ in Italian metadiscourse

23Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present paper contributes to metapragmatics, by examining the question of how historicity influences the validity of certain modern metaterms that are accepted as ‘neutral’ and ‘scientific’ in pragmatics. We argue that it is fundamental to explore the history and development of such metaterms, and also to study their historically situated meanings, in order to increase the self-reflexivity and rigour of analyses. We analyse the notion of ‘discernment’ as a case study, and we will show that the way in which the Italian equivalent of this term (discernere) – which supposedly influenced historical English understandings of ‘discernment’ as well – is used in historical Italian metadiscourses contradicts the modern application of this metaterm.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kádár, D. Z., & Paternoster, A. (2015). Historicity in metapragmatics – A study on ‘discernment’ in Italian metadiscourse. Pragmatics, 25(3), 369–391. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.25.3.03kad

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free