Abstract
The present paper contributes to metapragmatics, by examining the question of how historicity influences the validity of certain modern metaterms that are accepted as ‘neutral’ and ‘scientific’ in pragmatics. We argue that it is fundamental to explore the history and development of such metaterms, and also to study their historically situated meanings, in order to increase the self-reflexivity and rigour of analyses. We analyse the notion of ‘discernment’ as a case study, and we will show that the way in which the Italian equivalent of this term (discernere) – which supposedly influenced historical English understandings of ‘discernment’ as well – is used in historical Italian metadiscourses contradicts the modern application of this metaterm.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kádár, D. Z., & Paternoster, A. (2015). Historicity in metapragmatics – A study on ‘discernment’ in Italian metadiscourse. Pragmatics, 25(3), 369–391. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.25.3.03kad
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.