Mediating Instructional Reform: An Examination of the Relationship Between District Policy and Instructional Coaching

33Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Districts make and implement policies aiming to improve structures, practices, and outcomes. Instructional coaching has become a popular lever to catalyze instructional improvement efforts. However, many questions remain about the alignment between coaching and reforms. This article draws on coupling theory to analyze the relationship between district policy and instructional coaches’ work. Using qualitative case study data from a midsized urban district, I illuminate how coaching reflected three reforms: data use, teacher evaluation, and the Elementary English Language Arts program. I argue that cultural-cognitive, normative, and regulative mechanisms shaped the linkages between each reform and coaches’ work in schools. I reveal that structures and routines of coaching matter for coupling policy with practice. These findings have implications for policymakers, scholars, and educators concerned with leaders’ roles and responsibilities in enacting instructional reform.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Woulfin, S. L. (2018). Mediating Instructional Reform: An Examination of the Relationship Between District Policy and Instructional Coaching. AERA Open, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418792278

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free