Re-operation of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes after initial surgery with internal limiting membrane peel

118Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/aims: A retrospective consecutive case series to evaluate the efficacy of re-operation in patients with persistent or recurrent idiopathic full-thickness macular hole after initial surgery with internal limiting membrane peel (ILM). Methods: 491 patients underwent surgery for fullthickness macular hole from January 2004 to November 2007. Fifty-five patients either did not close or reopened during the follow-up period. Thirty patients with initial ILM peel underwent repeat surgery involving vitrectomy, enlargement of ILM rhexis and gas tamponade. Results: Anatomical closure rate was 88.8% for primary surgery and 46.7% (14/30) for re-operation. There was a statistically significant improvement in overall best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from re-operation baseline BCVA (p=0.02) within 1 year. For holes that did not close after the second surgery, visual acuity did not worsen. Conclusion: Re-operation has a reduced success rate of anatomical closure. However, BCVA is statistically significantly improved from re-operation baseline, so even though we cannot return vision to pre-pathological baseline, re-operation can improve on this new baseline.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

D’Souza, M. J. J., Chaudhary, V., Devenyi, R., Kertes, P. J., & Lam, W. C. (2011). Re-operation of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes after initial surgery with internal limiting membrane peel. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 95(11), 1564–1567. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2010.195826

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free