Use of C2 spinous process screw for posterior cervical fixation as substitute for laminar screw in a patient with thin laminae

7Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Rigid screw fixation of C2 including transarticular screw and pedicle screw contain the risk of vertebral artery (VA) injury. On the other hand, translaminar screws are considered to be safer for patients with anomalous VA. But C2 translaminar screw placement was limited in patients who have thin laminas and there is marked variation in C2 laminar thickness. Appropriate C2 fixation method for a patient who has thin laminas and high-riding VA together was controversial. Here, we present a case of an elderly Asian woman who had thin laminas and high-riding VA together with progressive myelopathy to report a first case of C2 spinous process screw insertion. Although the stability and safety of C2 spinous process screw was reported in cadaver series, there was no clinical report to our knowledge. Spinous process screw can be an option of C2 fixation for patients with high-riding VA and severe degenerated cervical spines including thin C2 laminas.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nagata, K., Baba, S., Chikuda, H., & Takeshita, K. (2013). Use of C2 spinous process screw for posterior cervical fixation as substitute for laminar screw in a patient with thin laminae. BMJ Case Reports. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-009889

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free