Ultrasound credentialing in North American emergency department systems with ultrasound fellowships: A cross-sectional survey

20Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To describe the credentialing systems of North American emergency department systems (EDS) with emergency ultrasound (EUS) fellowship programmes. Methods: This is a prospective, cross-sectional, surveybased study of North American EUS fellowships using a 62-item, pilot-tested, web-based survey instrument assessing credentialing and training systems. The American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) distributed the surveys using SNAP survey (Snap Surveys Ltd, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, USA). Results: Over 6 months, 75 eligible programmes were surveyed, 55 responded (73% response rate); 1 declined to participate leaving 54 participating programmes. Less than 20% of EDS credential nurses, physician assistants, nurse practitioners and students in EUS. Respondent EDS reported having an average of 4.2±3.3 ultrasound faculty members (faculty identifying their career focus as EUS). The median number of annual point-of-care ultrasounds reported was 5000 (IQR 3000-8000). 30 EDS (56%) credential each examination individually and 48 EDS (89%) use ACEP credentialing criteria. 61% of fellowship leadership believe their credentialing system is either satisfactory or very satisfactory (Cronbach's coefficient α=0.84). Conclusions: The data show heterogeneity among North American EDS with EUS fellowship programmes with regard to credentialing systems despite published guidelines from the ACEP and Canadian Emergency Ultrasound Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bellamkonda, V. R., Shokoohi, H., Alsaawi, A., Ding, R., Campbell, R. L., Liu, Y. T., & Boniface, K. S. (2015). Ultrasound credentialing in North American emergency department systems with ultrasound fellowships: A cross-sectional survey. Emergency Medicine Journal, 32(10), 804–808. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2014-204112

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free