A consistent comparison of bias models using observational data

14Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We investigate five different models for the dark matter (DM) halo bias, that is, the ratio of the fluctuations of mass tracers to those of the underlying mass, by comparing their cosmological evolution using optical quasar (QSO) and galaxy bias data at different redshifts, consistently scaled to the WMAP7 cosmology. Under the assumption that each halo hosts one extragalactic mass tracer, we use a χ 2-minimization procedure to determine the free parameters of the bias models as well as to statistically quantify their ability to represent the observational data. Using the Akaike information criterion we find that the model that represents best the observational data is the Basilakos & Plionis model with the tracer merger extension. The only other statistically equivalent model, as indicated by the same criterion, is the Tinker et al. model. Finally, we find an average, over the different models, DM halo mass that hosts optical QSOs of M h≃ 2.7(±0.6) × 10 12h -1M ⊙, while the corresponding value for optical galaxies is M h≃ 6.3(±2.1) × 10 11h -1M ⊙. © 2012 The Authors Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society © 2012 RAS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Papageorgiou, A., Plionis, M., Basilakos, S., & Ragone-Figueroa, C. (2012). A consistent comparison of bias models using observational data. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 422(1), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20559.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free