Evaluation of API Campy in comparison with conventional methods for identification of thermophilic campylobacters

22Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

API Campy was compared with conventional biochemical methods for its ability to identify 100 thermophilic campylobacter isolates. When the results were read according to the manufacturer's instructions, API Campy showed 92% agreement with conventional methods. Extended incubation of the assimilation strip resulted in the correct identification of an additional two isolates. Discrepant results occurred for six isolates. Overall, API Campy offered no advantages over conventional methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huysmans, M. B., Turnidge, J. D., & Williams, J. H. (1995). Evaluation of API Campy in comparison with conventional methods for identification of thermophilic campylobacters. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. American Society for Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.33.12.3345-3346.1995

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free