Hybridge: Bridging Spatiality for Inclusive and Equitable Hybrid Meetings

9Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Hybrid meetings limit inclusion for remote participants. The Hybridge experimental system provides different interfaces for remote and room endpoints, focusing on improving inclusion via shared spatiality and remote agency. In-room participants see remotes on displays around a table, and remotes see video integrated into a digital twin. Remotes can choose where to appear and from where they view the room. We tested Hybridge in a within-subjects study of group survival tasks. An in-person condition was followed by a counterbalanced order of hybrid traditional videoconferencing ("Gallery") and Hybridge. We found that co-presence and agency differences between in-room and remotes were alleviated in Hybridge but remained in Gallery. Physical presence for remotes was higher in Hybridge than Gallery. Conversation flow was better in Hybridge than Gallery, but ease of awareness was not different. We argue that asymmetry should be embraced when designing hybrid meeting systems, with inclusivity achieved by tailoring features for the needs of different endpoints.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Panda, P., Tankelevitch, L., Spittle, B., Inkpen, K., Tang, J., Junuzovic, S., … Rintel, S. (2024). Hybridge: Bridging Spatiality for Inclusive and Equitable Hybrid Meetings. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW2). https://doi.org/10.1145/3687040

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free