Is single-unit blood transfusion bad post-coronary artery bypass surgery?

21Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Publications in the surgical literature are very consistent in their conclusions that blood is dangerous with regard to in-hospital mortality, morbidity and long-term survival. Blood is frequently used as a volume expander while simultaneously increasing the haematocrit. We investigated the effects of a single-unit blood transfusion on long-term survival post-cardiac surgery in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting patients. METHODS: A prospective single-institution cardiac surgery database was analysed involving 4615 patients. Univariate, multivariate stepwise Cox regression analysis and propensity matching were performed to identify whether a single-unit blood transfusion was detrimental to long-term survival. RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed that blood was significantly associated with a reduced long-term survival even with a single-unit transfused, P = 0.0001. Cox multivariate regression analysis identified age, ejection fraction, preoperative dialysis, logistic EuroSCORE, postoperative CKMB, blood transfusion, urgent operative status and atrial fibrillation as significant factors determining long-term survival. When the Cox regression was repeated with patients who received no blood or only one unit of blood, transfusion was not a risk factor for long-term survival. An interaction analysis revealed that blood transfusion was significantly interacting with preoperative haemoglobin levels, P = 0.02. Propensity analysis demonstrated that a single-unit transfusion is not associated with a detrimental long-term survival, P = 0.3. CONCLUSIONS: Cox regression and propensity matching both indicate that a single-unit transfusion is not a significant cause of reduced long-term survival. Preoperative anaemia is a significant confounding factor. Despite demonstrating the negligible risks of a single-unit blood transfusion, we are not advocating liberal transfusion and would recommend changing from a double-unit to a single-unit transfusion policy. We speculate that blood is not bad, but that the underlying reason that it is given might be. © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Warwick, R., Mediratta, N., Chalmers, J., Pullan, M., Shaw, M., Mcshane, J., & Poullis, M. (2013). Is single-unit blood transfusion bad post-coronary artery bypass surgery? Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 16(6), 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivt062

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free