Remote data collection during COVID-19 restrictions: an example from a refugee and asylum-seeker participant group in the UK

3Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Abstract: This article describes how one trial site of the Refugee Emergency: Defining and Implementing Novel Evidence-based psychosocial interventions (RE-DEFINE) study, designed to evaluate a Self Help+ intervention with Arabic-speaking refugees and asylum seekers currently living in the UK and experiencing stress, was adapted to accommodate social distancing rules and working from home during the COVID-19 restrictions. Digital divide, risk and safety management, acceptability of remote data collection and practical considerations are described. The adaptions to methods have practical implications for researchers looking for more flexible approaches in response to continuing restrictions resulting from COVID-19, and the authors believe that others could adopt such an approach. The need for a further acceptability study focusing on human and economic costs and benefits of telephone and video as an alternative to face-to-face data collection is indicated. Trials Registration: Refugee Emergency - Defining and Implementing Novel Evidence-based psychosocial interventions RE-DEFINE. (Trials registration numbers NCT03571347, NCT03587896) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030259 (2019).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walker, L., Bailey, D., Churchill, R., & Peckham, E. (2021, December 1). Remote data collection during COVID-19 restrictions: an example from a refugee and asylum-seeker participant group in the UK. Trials. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05058-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free