Prognostic Impact and Late Evolution of Untreated Moderate (2/4+) Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement

21Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic impact and late evolution of associated tricuspid regurgitation (TR) 2/4+ after aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods We evaluated 61 patients who underwent AVR between 2003 and 2012 (35 for aortic stenosis [AS], 26 for aortic regurgitation [AR]) with associated untreated TR 2/4+. Patients with concomitant mitral disease were excluded. Median follow-up was 3.2 years. Serial echocardiographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed. Results Mean age was 65 ± 13 years; 26% of the patients were in NYHA class III-IV. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 53 ± 11%. Comorbidity included: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 5%, chronic renal failure in 13%, coronary artery disease in 20%, history of stroke/TIA in 8%. Thirty-day mortality was 1.6%. Overall actuarial survival was 83 ± 6% at 6.5 years, with a freedom from cardiac death of 90 ± 5%. Freedom from TR ≥3+ was 86 ± 6% at 6.5 years. At last follow-up, 82% of the patients had TR 0-1/4+, 9% had TR 2/4+, 4.5% had TR 3/4+ and 4.5% had TR 4/4+. Occurrence of TR ≥ 3+ at follow-up was associated with increased cardiac mortality (HR 10.5; p = 0.009). Conclusions preoperative untreated TR 2/4+ improves or remains stable in the majority of patients. The poor outcomes associated with TR > 2+ suggest the need for better methods to identify subjects at risk for TR progression. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12656 (J Card Surg 2016;31:9-14)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Taramasso, M., Maisano, F., De Bonis, M., Pozzoli, A., Schiavi, D., Benussi, S., … Alfieri, O. (2016). Prognostic Impact and Late Evolution of Untreated Moderate (2/4+) Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement. Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 31(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.12656

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free