Policy strategies to reduce waits for elective care: A synthesis of international evidence

91Citations
Citations of this article
137Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This synthesis seeks to assess and explain the effectiveness of policy interventions to reduce elective wait times or lists. PubMed, EMBASE, EconLit, and grey literature were systematically searched for relevant studies and reviews. Strategies with the strongest evidence base include paying for activity, buying capacity locally and setting targets with strong incentives. There is also evidence for improving the use of existing capacity. Limiting demand through rationing can reduce waits, but is ethically problematic. Short-term injections of funding, cross-border treatment schemes, unenforced targets and promotion of private health insurance had the weakest evidence. Available evidence favours options that act fairly directly on supply, demand or local organizations' behaviour, over indirect strategies that depend on a 'domino effect'. Further research is needed to determine how to achieve major, system-wide improvements in the use of capacity. © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kreindler, S. A. (2010, September). Policy strategies to reduce waits for elective care: A synthesis of international evidence. British Medical Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldq014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free