China’s Urban Transformation in the Shadow of Regulatory Centralism: The Revitalization of Old Industrial Cities as a Case

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Recent research has focused on a dialectical examination of neoliberalism and China’s inherent authoritarian regulatory regime and the planned economy tradition. In the same vein, this study examines China’s institutional reform and emergent goal-oriented governance since the early 1980s. It argues that China’s four decades of marketization and decentralization reforms are not toward neoliberalism, but have been accompanied by increased authoritarian regulation and state intervention. The reform aimed at complementing rather than dismantling the socialist planned economy through the localization of marketization and the adoption of a “small government” logic. A survey on the revitalization of an old industrial base in Lanzhou detailed the flow of power and its operation under the post-reform regulatory centralism. By delegating the power to formulate planning, the right to intervene in the land market, and the autonomy of policy innovation to the local governments, the central government can achieve precise intervention in local governance and land development, thereby achieving the strategic goal of national accumulation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guo, J., Jin, L., & Yang, Y. (2022). China’s Urban Transformation in the Shadow of Regulatory Centralism: The Revitalization of Old Industrial Cities as a Case. Land, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/land11111945

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free