A pharmacoeconomic study: Cost-utility analysis of modern wound dressings vs conventional wound dressings in patients with diabetic foot ulcer

0Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Duration of treatment and outcome of therapy of diabetic foot ulcers are some of the factors that affect the quality of life and will require higher medical costs. Aim: This study aimed to choose an alternative wound dressing that provides the best utility at the most cost-efficient. Methods: The research method used was pharmacoeconomics with a patient’s perspective. Results: The results showed the mean cost of modern wound dressings per visit was IDR 347,131, while that of conventional wound dressings was IDR 47,140. The quality of life with modern vs conventional wound dressing was significantly different (p < 0.05). The incremental cost utility ratio (ICUR) value was IDR 22,813 per quality of life (QoL). Conclusions: This study showed that modern wound dressings provide a higher quality of life at a higher cost. Indeed, it cost more than IDR 22,813 to change from conventional to modern wound dressings and increase 1 unit of quality of life, but patients obtained an additional 13.15 quality of life.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rahmawati, C., & Nopitasari, B. L. (2021). A pharmacoeconomic study: Cost-utility analysis of modern wound dressings vs conventional wound dressings in patients with diabetic foot ulcer. Pharmacy Education, 21(2), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2021.212.7176

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free