Antibacterial activity of four plant extracts extracted from traditional chinese medicinal plants against listeria monocytogenes, escherichia coli, and salmonella enterica subsp. Enterica serovar enteritidis

29Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The worldwide ethnobotanical use of four investigated plants indicates antibacterial properties. The aim of this study was to screen and determine significant antibacterial activity of four plant extracts in vitro and in a poultry digest model. Using broth microdilution, the concentrations at which four plant extracts inhibited Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enteritidis, and Escherichia coli over 24 hours was determined. Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb, Iris domestica (L.) Goldblatt and Mabb, Anemone chinensis Bunge, and Smilax glabra Roxb all exhibited a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 62.5mg/L and a minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of 500mg/L against one pathogen. A. pilosa Ledeb was the most effective against L. monocytogenes and E. coli with the exception of S. enteritidis, for which A. chinensis Bunge was the most effective. Time–kills of A. pilosa Ledeb and A. chinensis Bunge against L. monocytogenes, E. coli and S. enteritidis incubated in poultry cecum were used to determine bactericidal activity of these plant extracts. A. chinensis Bunge, significantly reduced S. enteritidis by ≥ 99.99% within 6 hours. A. pilosa Ledeb exhibited effective significant bactericidal activity within 4 hours against L. monocytogenes and E. coli. This paper highlights the potential of these plant extracts to control pathogens commonly found in the poultry gastrointestinal tract.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McMurray, R. L., Ball, M. E. E., Tunney, M. M., Corcionivoschi, N., & Situ, C. (2020). Antibacterial activity of four plant extracts extracted from traditional chinese medicinal plants against listeria monocytogenes, escherichia coli, and salmonella enterica subsp. Enterica serovar enteritidis. Microorganisms, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060962

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free