Utility of PAX2 as a marker for diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia

47Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) requires learning new criteria. Two trainees rendered diagnoses based on biopsy findings, and then measured the effect of reviewing PAX2 on their interpretation. Fifty-two endometrial biopsy specimens diagnosed as having EIN were evaluated using EIN criteria. Background endometrial pattern, altered differentiation, and any features complicating diagnosis were noted. PAX2 stains were scored as confusing, helpful, or noncontributory. Fifty-two cases generated 104 passes; 82% were rediagnosed as EIN. The diagnosis was complicated because of altered differentiation (14%), EIN and background separation (13%), large lesions lacking background (11%), and secretory background (8%). PAX2 was most helpful in cases with secretory backgrounds and when EIN lacked adjacent normal tissue, and most confusing when scoring was ambiguous (14%). The diagnosis of EIN can be difficult when: (1) the lesion cannot be easily compared with background; (2) there is a confounding process; and (3) gland differentiation is altered. PAX2 can be of assistance in delimiting EIN lesions. © American Society for Clinical Pathology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Quick, C. M., Laury, A. R., Monte, N. M., & Mutter, G. L. (2012). Utility of PAX2 as a marker for diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 138(5), 678–684. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCP8OMLT7KDWLMF

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free