Persistence, adherence, and risk of discontinuation associated with commonly prescribed antihypertensive drug monotherapies

126Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To assess 1-year persistence and adherence with monotherapy using the most commonly dispensed individual agent in 4 antihypertensive drug classes: hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), amlodipine, lisinopril, or valsartan. Design: Retrospective, longitudinal analysis of initial prescriptions during 2001 to 2002 from a nationwide administrative claims database representing 11 million covered lives in the United States. Measurements: Drug utilization following initiation. Cox proportional hazards regression models controlled for demographics, case-mix, and concomitant treatments. Results: Records for 60,685 subjects were included: HCTZ (n = 18,713), amlodipine (n = 11,520), lisinopril (n = 21,138), or valsartan (n = 9314). Over 1 year, 31% to 44% of subjects utilized no treatment for at least 60 days. Medication possession ratio (MPR) and adherence measures ranged from 73% to 90%. Valsartan was associated with significantly (P < .001) more favorable measures of persistence, length of therapy, time to discontinuation, MPR, and risk of discontinuation, compared with HCTZ, amlodipine, or lisinopril. The risk of discontinuation was 53%, 32%, and 14% greater for HCTZ, amlodipine, and lisinopril, respectively, versus valsartan (all comparisons P < .001). Conclusion: Among antihypertensive agents studied, valsartan was associated with the most favorable utilization patterns. Health care providers and systems should evaluate the use of antihypertensive drugs within their populations to identify and manage treatment discontinuation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elliott, W. J., Plauschinat, C. A., Skrepnek, G. H., & Gause, D. (2007). Persistence, adherence, and risk of discontinuation associated with commonly prescribed antihypertensive drug monotherapies. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 20(1), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2007.01.060094

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free