The Role of Lexical Cohesive Devices in Triggering Negotiations for Meaning

  • Crossley S
  • Salsbury T
  • McNamara D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The authors compare the frequency of negotiations for meaning in a natural spoken corpus to a variety of cohesive devices. The study demonstrates that a lack of cohesive devices in non-native speaker (NNS) discourse correlates to negotiations for meaning. The data comes from a year- long longitudinal study of six beginning NNSs and comprised 99 transcripts. The transcripts were coded for negotiations for meaning. Regression analyses suggested that causal cohesion and semantic co-referentiality were significantly related to the frequency of negotiations for meaning. Additionally, NNS discourse demonstrates a significant decrease in frequency of negotiations for meaning as a function of time. Taken together, these results suggest that negotiations for meaning are related to a lack of cohesive devices in NNS speech.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Crossley, S., Salsbury, T. L., & McNamara, D. S. (2010). The Role of Lexical Cohesive Devices in Triggering Negotiations for Meaning. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/l4181005124

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free