Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: Surgery versus non-operative management

24Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This 12-month retrospective study compared pain relief, quality of life (QoL), treatment cost-effectiveness and complication rates in patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP; n = 58), percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP; n = 55), or conservative medical therapy (CMT; n = 55). After surgery, Cobb angle and vertebral height ere significantly improved in the PKP group. PVP and PKP patients had significantly less pain immediately after surgery than CMT patients, but this difference disappeared between weeks 2-8, only to return from months 6-12. QoL was significantly better among the surgical groups after surgery and was lower in the CMT group than in the surgical groups. Treatment times were shorter with PVP and PKP, but costs were lower with CMT. The rate of secondary fractures during follow-up was greater with CMT. Overall, PVP was considered the first choice treatment for OVCF with refractory pain. © 2011 Field House Publishing LLP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tang, H., Zhao, J., & Hao, C. (2011). Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: Surgery versus non-operative management. Journal of International Medical Research, 39(4), 1438–1447. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001103900432

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free