Tularemia on martha's vineyard: Seroprevalence and occupational risk

83Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We conducted a serosurvey of landscapers to determine if they were at increased risk for exposure to Francisella tularensis and to determine risk factors for infection. In Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts, landscapers (n=132) were tested for anti-F. tularensis antibody and completed a questionnaire. For comparison, serum samples from three groups of nonlandscaper Martha's Vineyard residents (n=103, 99, and 108) were tested. Twelve landscapers (9.1%) were seropositive, compared with one person total from the comparison groups (prevalence ratio 9.0; 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 68.1; p=0.02). Of landscapers who used a power blower, 15% were seropositive, compared to 2% who did not use a power blower (prevalence ratio 9.2; 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 69.0; p=0.02). Seropositive landscapers worked more hours per week mowing and weed-whacking and mowed more lawns per week than their seronegative counterparts. Health-care workers in tularemia-endemic areas should consider tularemia as a diagnosis for landscapers with a febrile illness.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feldman, K. A., Stiles-Enos, D., Julian, K., Matyas, B. T., Telford, S. R., Chu, M. C., … Hayes, E. B. (2003). Tularemia on martha’s vineyard: Seroprevalence and occupational risk. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 9(3), 350–354. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0903.020462

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free